String vs StringBuilder vs StringBuffer in Java

📘 Premium Read: Access my best content on Medium member-only articles — deep dives into Java, Spring Boot, Microservices, backend architecture, interview preparation, career advice, and industry-standard best practices.

✅ Some premium posts are free to read — no account needed. Follow me on Medium to stay updated and support my writing.

🎓 Top 10 Udemy Courses (Huge Discount): Explore My Udemy Courses — Learn through real-time, project-based development.

▶️ Subscribe to My YouTube Channel (172K+ subscribers): Java Guides on YouTube

When working with text data in Java, developers often find themselves choosing between String, StringBuilder, and StringBuffer. Although they serve similar purposes, they have distinct characteristics that can significantly impact performance, memory usage, and thread safety. In this post, we'll explore these differences and help you decide which class to use in different scenarios.

Difference Between String, StringBuilder, and StringBuffer in Java

1. Immutability 

String: It is immutable, meaning its value cannot be changed once created. Every modification leads to a new object. This ensures thread safety but can be inefficient for frequent changes. 

StringBuilder and StringBuffer: Both are mutable. You can alter their content without creating new objects, making them more efficient for frequent modifications. 

2. Thread Safety 

String: Being immutable, it is inherently thread-safe. 

StringBuilder: Not synchronized, and therefore not thread-safe. Faster for this reason. 

StringBuffer: Synchronized, making it thread-safe. This adds overhead and makes it slower than StringBuilder. 

3. Performance 

String: Slower when it comes to frequent modifications due to immutability. 

StringBuilder: Faster for repeated changes since no new objects are created. 

StringBuffer: Slightly slower than StringBuilder due to synchronization. 

4. Storage Area 

String: Stored in the String Pool, helping in-memory optimization. 

StringBuilder and StringBuffer: Stored in the heap, without any special pooling. 

5. Concatenation 

String: Concatenation creates new objects, leading to more garbage collection. Not suitable for extensive concatenation operations. 

StringBuilder and StringBuffer: append method enables efficient concatenation without creating new objects. 

6. Usage Recommendations 

String: Use when the text won't change, and thread safety is required. 

StringBuilder: Use in a single-threaded environment for frequent changes. 

StringBuffer: Use in multi-threaded scenarios where text changes often. 

7. Examples

// String
String str = "Java";
str += "Guides"; // New object created

// StringBuilder
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder("Java");
sb.append("Guides"); // Same object modified

// StringBuffer
StringBuffer sbf = new StringBuffer("Java");
sbf.append("Guides"); // Same object modified, thread-safe

String vs StringBuilder vs StringBuffer - Cheat Sheet

Conclusion 

String, StringBuilder, and StringBuffer are designed for different scenarios, and understanding these differences is crucial for writing efficient and robust code. Use String for immutable sequences, StringBuilder for mutable sequences in single-threaded applications, and StringBuffer for mutable sequences in multi-threaded applications. Testing and considering your specific use case will guide you to the optimal choice.

Related Blog Posts

1. Java StringBuffer: Methods, Examples, and Performance Tips
2. Java StringBuffer Class API Guide
   
3. When to Use String, StringBuffer, and StringBuilder in Java
4. String vs StringBuffer in Java with Example (Performance Analysis)
5. Java StringBuilder: Basics, Methods, Examples, Performance Tips
6. Java String: A Guide to String Basics, Methods, Immutability, Performance, and Best Practices
   
7. Java String Class API Guide - Covers all the String Methods
   
8. Best Way to Reverse a String in Java
   
9. Guide to Java String Constant Pool
10. Guide to String Best Practices in Java (Best Practice)